<?xml version="1.0"?>
            <rss version="2.0">
                <channel>
                    <title>Safer Medicines - Latest News</title>
                    <link>http://www.safermedicines.org</link>
                    <description>Latest News from Safer Medicines</description>
                    <language>en-gb</language>
                    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
                    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                    <docs>http://www.safermedicines.org</docs>
                    
            <item><title>MPs back our campaign above 99% of all parliamentary motions</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;With 160 MP signatures, our Early Day Motion (&lt;span class=&quot;s1&quot;&gt;EDM 475&lt;/span&gt;) calling for safer medicines was among the most-signed 1% of over 3,000 EDMs in the 2010-12 session of parliament.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;This was the 3rd time our EDM had been in the top 1% &amp;ndash; previous motions in 2005-06 and 2008-09 attracted 250 and 243 signatures, respectively. Clearly, there is phenomenal parliamentary support for the modernisation of drug safety testing that we are calling for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thank you so much to all of you who contacted your MPs &amp;ndash; you really made a difference.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p2&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;../safetyofmedicines/bill.shtml&quot;&gt;See more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=75</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                </item><item><title>15,000 signature petition delivered to Number 10 Downing Street</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;Veteran politician Tony Benn&amp;nbsp;joined actors Mat Fraser and Carol Royle,&amp;nbsp;plus Green MP Dr Caroline Lucas,&amp;nbsp;to present a 15,000 signature petition to Number 10 Downing Street. The Safer Medicines&amp;nbsp;patrons, alongside other MPs, including David Amess (Conservative), Dr Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat) and Grahame Morris (Labour), are calling for superior new tests based on human biology to be compared with the animal tests currently used to assess the safety of new medicines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;View the presentation &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtu.be/XcG2UgvVbV0&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=70</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                </item><item><title>Second letter published in The Lancet</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;Predictably, the pro-animal-research lobby attacked our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)60802-7/fulltext/&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;s1&quot;&gt;open&amp;nbsp;letter to the Prime Minister and Health Secretary &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;with a response &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)60984-7/fulltext&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;s2&quot;&gt;published in The Lancet on 9th July&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;We are very pleased that our response to such a false and&amp;nbsp;ill-informed&amp;nbsp;attack was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)61669-3/fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;s2&quot;&gt;published in The Lancet on 28th October&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=74</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                </item><item><title>Open letter to David Cameron and Andrew Lansley published in The Lancet</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;Safer Medicines Trust joined forces with 21 senior scientists to call on the Prime Minister and Health Secretary to compare animal tests for drug safety&amp;nbsp;with newer tests based on &lt;em&gt;human&lt;/em&gt; biology. Our letter was published in the world's&amp;nbsp;leading medical journal, The Lancet, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)60802-7/fulltext/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sky News covered the story with an excellent report, available &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Scientists-Write-To-David-Cameron-And-Andrew-Lansley-Over-Medicine-And-Drug-Failures/Article/201106116004688?lpos=Politics_Top_Stories_Header_2&amp;amp;lid=ARTICLE_16004688_Scientists_Write_To_David_Cameron_And_Andrew_Lansley_Over_Medicine_And_Drug_Failures&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and an interview with Safer Medicines Trust director Kathy Archibald &lt;a href=&quot;../news/skyvid.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Daily Mail also reported on the story, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1393745/Bad-reactions-medicines-lead-million-people-year-admitted-hospital.html?ito=feeds-newsxml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=68</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                </item><item><title>Newsletter Autumn 2011 available now</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Newsletter Autumn 11&quot; href=&quot;../newsletters/newsletter_autumna-11.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;Read our latest newsletter here (pdf)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=73</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                </item><item><title>Article published on the Science Advisory Board website</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;div style=&quot;color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; margin: 8px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Human-Focused Testing to Treat Human Diseases&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Human-Focused Testing to Treat Human Diseases Dr Margaret Clotworthy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.scienceboard.net/community/perspectives.245.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;You can read the article here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=67</link>                </item><item><title>Human Tissues Conference Proceedings published</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;The proceedings of our Human Tissue Conference, held in the House of Lords in October 2009, have been published as a special edition of the journal &lt;a title=&quot;human tissues conference cell tissue banking journal abstracts&quot; href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/h7qt26107542/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Cell &amp;amp; Tissue Banking&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=66</link>                </item><item><title>Press Complaints Commission defends Sunday Times' rewriting of medical history</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you were the PCC, how would you defend a newspaper's claim that British Airways, for example, rather than the Wright brothers, pioneered flight? Simple: rewrite the definition of&amp;nbsp;the word &quot;pioneer&quot;!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incredibly, this is how low those who are charged with upholding standards in the press are willing to stoop in order to defend the media's wilful misrepresentation of facts concerning animal experimentation. This concerns Safer Medicines Campaign because we exist to expose the truth about&amp;nbsp;the best means to discover and&amp;nbsp;develop treatments for patients and to ensure their safety.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The truth is that medical progress is overwhelmingly the result of human clinical observation and studies of human tissues and human disease, rather than research based on animal &quot;models&quot; of human disease. In fact, patients are frequently harmed by reliance on misleading data from&amp;nbsp;animal experimentation. We do not oppose animal experimentation &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt; but we do believe that&amp;nbsp;it should cease to be given precedence over human-focused testing. Greater focus on research based on&amp;nbsp;human biology would accelerate medical progress and improve the safety of treatments for patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But defenders of animal experimentation often&amp;nbsp;claim that medical breakthroughs depended on animal experimentation, refusing to acknowledge that&amp;nbsp;the pivotal&amp;nbsp;discoveries were made in humans (or &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt;)&amp;nbsp;and only later recapitulated in animal models. Their mission is to&amp;nbsp;convince people&amp;nbsp;that animal experimentation is crucial to medical progress. In their eagerness to make their point, truth is&amp;nbsp;often jettisoned in favour of good copy. Editorial codes stipulating accuracy&amp;nbsp;do not appear to apply to this particular topic, as we have found many times.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;../pcc/index.shtml#more&quot;&gt;Read more here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=63</link>                </item><item><title>Public consultation on computer modelling</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;An EU-funded &lt;a title=&quot;public consultation in silico computer modelling EU Orchestra&quot; href=&quot;http://www.orchestra-qsar.eu/survey-questionnaire-policy-issues-around-in-silico-methods-alternatives-animal-testing&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;public consultation&lt;/a&gt; on the use of computer modelling as an alternative to animal testing has been launched. The questionnaire is quite short; please take this opportunity to &lt;a title=&quot;leaflet about in silico methods computer modelling&quot; href=&quot;http://www.orchestra-qsar.eu/sites/default/files/Introductory_leaflet_on_in-silico_methods.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;find out more&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;em&gt;in silico&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;methods and support their use. The impact of these methods is also discussed in relation to &lt;a title=&quot;EU REACH programme&quot; href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/reach/index_en.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;REACH&lt;/a&gt;, the EU programme to gather toxicity data on thousands of chemicals. A&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title=&quot;in silico methods questionnaire scientists EU Orchestra &quot; href=&quot;http://www.orchestra-qsar.eu/survey-summary-benefits-and-barriers-to-qsar&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;questionnaire for scientists&lt;/a&gt; is also available.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=62</link>                </item><item><title>Human Tissues Conference Proceedings published</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Proceedings of our &lt;a title=&quot;human tissues conference house of lords&quot; href=&quot;../humantissues/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Human Tissues Conference&lt;/a&gt;, held in the House of Lords in October 2009, have just been published online by the journal &lt;em&gt;Cell &amp;amp; Tissue Banking&lt;/em&gt;! Please &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:margaret@safermedicines.org&quot;&gt;contact us&lt;/a&gt; or visit the&lt;a title=&quot;Cell &amp;amp; Tissue banking journal&quot; href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/104845/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; journal website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=60</link>                </item><item><title>The Politics Show (BBC1) interviewed Safer Medicines Director, Sunday 26th September </title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;Kathy Archibald, Director of Safer Medicines Campaign and Safer Medicines Trust, was interviewed live on the Politics Show on&amp;nbsp;Sunday 26th September (East Midlands region).&amp;nbsp;You can watch the programme &lt;a href=&quot;../audiovisual/politics_show.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, with kind permission of the BBC.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=58</link>                </item><item><title>In vitro technology bids for prestigious Innovation 10 prize </title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Kirkstall quasi vivo technology&quot; href=&quot;http://www.kirkstall.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Kirkstall&lt;/a&gt;, an innovative Sheffield company, has launched a video in support of their bid to win a prestigious Technology Strategy Board prize. Their technology enables different human cell types to be grown in an interconnected way, using a microfluidic flow system. This 'quasi vivo' system more accurately reflects the way in which cells grow in the body, and hence provides more relevant results. We are delighted that Managing Director Dr Malcolm Wilkinson praised our campaign for safer medicines during the course of his video, and wish Kirkstall the best of luck! Winning the &amp;pound;100k prize would enable Kirkstall to develop their technology even further. Please view and rate their entry &lt;a title=&quot;Kirkstall Technology Strategy Board video&quot; href=&quot;http://www.innovate10.co.uk/video/quasi-vivo-safety-te&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (or &lt;a title=&quot;Kirkstall Technology Strategy Board video&quot; href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgo8sexyJXE&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). Please note: as only scientific comments are requested, it is perfectly acceptable to vote without commenting!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=57</link>                </item><item><title>Newsletter Autumn 2010 available now</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;Read our latest newsletter &lt;a href=&quot;../newsletters/newsletter_autumn_10.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (pdf)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=56</link>                </item><item><title>Safety of Medicines Bill and Early Day Motion </title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;Senior Conservative MP David Amess presented the Safety of Medicines Bill to the House of Commons on 20th July. &lt;a href=&quot;../safetyofmedicines/bill.shtml&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cross-party group of MPs has also tabled &lt;a href=&quot;http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=41427&amp;amp;SESSION=905&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Early Day Motion&amp;nbsp;475 &lt;/a&gt;in support of the Bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You can help:&lt;/strong&gt; please&amp;nbsp;send &lt;a href=&quot;../safetyofmedicines/postcard2010.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;our postcard&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to your&amp;nbsp;MP. &lt;a href=&quot;../safetyofmedicines/bill.shtml&quot;&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=55</link>                </item><item><title>ASAT Foundation Supports Safer Medicines Initiative</title>
                    
                    
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;We are delighted that the Dutch &lt;a title=&quot;Assuring Safety without Animal Testing Foundation&quot; href=&quot; http://www.asat-foundation.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Assuring Safety without Animal Testing&amp;nbsp;Foundation&lt;/a&gt; has announced&amp;nbsp;its &lt;a title=&quot;ASAT Foundation supports Safer Medicines Trust drug safety test comparison evaluation&quot; href=&quot;http://www.asat-foundation.org/#22)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;support&lt;/a&gt; for our initiative to modernise drug safety testing by&amp;nbsp;conducting a comparison between human biology-based methods and animal&amp;nbsp;tests using a set of drugs known to cause side effects that were not&amp;nbsp;predicted in animals. It is chaired by Dr Bart Sangster, who is also&amp;nbsp;Vice Chair of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Agency.&amp;nbsp;Dr Sangster's illustrious career has included a position as Senior&amp;nbsp;Vice President Safety &amp;amp; Environmental Assurance at Unilever, a&amp;nbsp;professorship in Clinical Toxicology at the University of Utrecht, and&amp;nbsp;posts as Head of the Poison Control Centre at the National Institute&amp;nbsp;for Public Health &amp;amp; the Environment and the Intensive Care Department&amp;nbsp;of the University Hospital Utrecht.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.safermedicines.org/latestnews.php?pid=53</link>                </item></channel></rss>
